On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 00:08, ZuLuuuuuu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering what is the best and easiest way to execute a system command > without waiting for a response (I guess it is called asynchronous process?). > > Smalltalk#system: waits for the response. For example, when I do: > > Smalltalk system: 'gedit' > > gedit is opened but the interpreter is locked until I close gedit. I want > the interpreter not to be locked and I want gedit to be still open even if I > quit the interpreter. Is something like this possible?
You can use a "fake" pipe (FileStream class>>#popen:dir:) for this. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
