Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/1340
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/1340
Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: Build
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: dcb
Updated by: zecke
Status: active
The warnings are annoying but they are misleading. Our "printf" comes
from the GNU snprintfv library which has a function to register
extensions (e.g. %O) to it. I think the documentation from GNU libc
applies here as well:
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Printf-Extension-Exam....
Maybe you can see if we can teach the compiler that %O is valid and
expects an OOP?
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
