just to be clear that i am not trying to discourage your efforts - you saw a problem and you solved it; not only for yourself but in a way that could benefit others also - that is a very good thing - quite awesome in fact - i only meant to point out that flatpacks are not the ideal solutions to such problems
if the problem you wanted to solve is "the gst-browser does not work in fedora"; then the better solution would be to contact the fedora packager and ask why it is broken and how could you help to fix the fedora package - they may have said its a known problem upstream and we can not fix it here - then the next thing to do would be to contact the GNU smalltalk developers and see what could be done to fix the problem to bypass the upstreams and instead package it for flatpack is not as helpful as it may seem - for one thing, most fedora users will not know that your package exists and if they did, they should not want to use it for the reasons i mentioned in the previous message - if the version that their distro packages is broken, i think they are more likely to lose interest in the program entirely,, rather than to seek an alternative distribution channel
pgpbuGuKoZdut.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
