If it's not working with a delay in the main process it sounds like a bug. What if you put a counter in the main process and print it as well, does the main process stop too, or is it just the forked process?
Btw, on my Linux machine your original example works the way you expect. I get the output: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... and so on, until I interrupt it. Both with v3.2.5 and current master branch. /Tommy _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
