Indeed. We should promote 3.2.91 to 3.3.0 and cope with VisualGST being slightly broken (it's based on GTK+ 2.0 anyway). Let me aim to do this before the end of the year.
holger > On 14. Nov 2021, at 09:11, bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW, the history of smalltralk is lined with arguments such that > it is an evolutionary dead-end, - the rationales have shifted > drastically and continuously over the years; but guess what, > smalltalk is still here and still evolving > > WRT GNU smalltalk, those distros with a broken GST are using the > most recent release; but it has bit-rot, and requires some > routine maintenance upstream - the team should consider > promoting 3.2.91 to a release, before GNU smalltalk gets removed > from debian, for example - arch has been packaging 3.2.91 for > years >
