Karl Berry píše v So 11. 03. 2006 v 17:30 -0600: > I didn't try it, but I think that might get you Part A, Part B, ... > And then nested @section's should be A.1, A.2, ... > I realized that isn't what you asked for, but it is closer.
A.1, A.2 would be fine. Actually much better. The problem is this would only work for TeX. I need to generate other outputs too (html and docbook). > Or you could perhaps use @unnumberedsec instead of @section and number > the sections yourself. This is the obvious solution, but I'd really like to avoid it. > Many many years ago (I can't even find when), @section (and @subsection > and @subsubsection) was changed to be equivalent to @unnumberedsec > (@appendixsec) within @unnumbered (@appendix). That had the obvious > advantage of not having to change commands when a chapter type changed, > as well as generally not having to remember so many commands. I understand the reasons now. However, I think, for the future, TeXInfo could provide a command equivalent to chapter, section etc. where one could specify the method of numbering (letters, numbers, roman numbers...). TeX is able to do that, so it should not be a big problem. Thank you, Hynek _______________________________________________ Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-texinfo
