Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> In general, I'm a believer in "one index". However, if the functions > have the same names in both languages, I don't know how they'd be > distinguished in this case. In this case, they have different names. > The only way I can think of at present is to abuse @deftp or @defvr and > then label the type/variable index as the Scheme (whichever) index in > the @[EMAIL PROTECTED] commands. But maybe you are already using them > too? That would seem kind of ugly. ;-) We are using [EMAIL PROTECTED]' a bit, although no variable index is actually produced currently. > It would probably would not be terribly difficult to implement commands > to change the hardwired index used, as in > @deffnindex xx > @deftpindex xx > @defvrindex xx > where xx is any index name (built-in or user-defined), and the command > takes effect until the next such @def...index. But it seems rather a > complication in an already-too-complicated area. That would work but it does indeed complicate things a little bit. > Can you show me the actual manual? Maybe there's a simpler way. The manual is that of the latest unstable releases (i.e., 1.7.x): http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/manual/html_node/index.html The index is here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/manual/html_node/Function-and-Data-Index.html Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-texinfo
