On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:17:55AM +0100, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > > > > Since this last exchange a couple months ago, i've tried to answer "in > > which format" by playing w/ code. (I agree that makeinfo should be > > hands-off, for the most part, btw.) If you get a chance, please see: > > I had the opposite idea. To me, the idea was that makeinfo would > generate both the XML that describe the nodes, and the IXIN file > that describes the whole document.
Though, if you already have the tools that generate the sxml and the indices from the Texinfo XML then it is fine too (or even better) as it means less work for makeinfo. -- Pat
