It occurs to me that one requires two image versions:
(1) An image for high-resolution pdf; and (2) Another
image for low resolution image html.
Can we think of only having one command that calls
@image, rather than two (i.e. rather than having @iftex
and @ifhtml)?
For instance,
@image{../Ideogr/Ch03b--Chmed/igc03--01--Sicl--CircAmRg,,,,.png}
For pdf output will use the file
../Ideogr/Ch03b--Chmed/igc03--01--Sicl--CircAmRg.png
For html output will use
../Ideogr/Ch03b--Chmed/igc03--01--Sicl--CircAmRg.html.png
Or the like.
Regards
Christopher
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 7:40 PM
> From: "Christopher Dimech" <[email protected]>
> To: "Gavin Smith" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "help-texinfo gnu" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail
>
> Choosing the maximum number of horizontal pixel to be 500 gets acceptable
> results.
>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 5:48 PM
> > From: "Gavin Smith" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Christopher Dimech" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Patrice Dumas" <[email protected]>, "help-texinfo gnu"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:20:13AM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > > Can't the large image be downsized with the height and width attributes in
> > > html?
> >
> > No, I mean changing the actual files themselves.
> >
>
>
