On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:57:35AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 08:44:17 +0200 > > From: [email protected] > > > > There will be differences in the renderers. Neither info nor man > > can do pics, HTML and PDF can. > > The Emacs Info reader does display the pictures when they are > available (and assuming Emacs was built with support for the > corresponding image format).
That's great to know, thanks :) > > Pics aren't for all people. > > Some Info manuals use pictures to describe complex workflows or data > structures. That's why Texinfo supports images to begin with. Mine was just a (perhaps too) short hint towards the fact that with new media you open a new can of worms (accessibility,etc.). > > > > The future is already here: just use Texinfo manuals for everything. > > > > This is exactly the kind of attitude which hinders progress here. > > > > I assume Eli meant that tongue-in-cheek, he does have that kind > > of dry humour I actually like. But here, I find that unhelpful. > > I'm known to be unhelpful in some quarters, yes. I do appreciate and enjoy your dry humour, though. Personally, I don't know about "some quarters". And I wouldn't attach the label "unhelpful" to a person. Perhaps to some very specific expression, yes. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
