-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: HERA 19 configuration (Version 3)
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:18:00 -0700
From:   Jonathan Pober <[email protected]>
To:     Chris Carilli <[email protected]>



Yeah, I think anything outside the HERA footprint is out. Attached is a picture of the single channel, snapshot uv coverage of all the PAPER dipoles (not just the imaging circle; rotated dipoles are excluded, though). Left hand plot is linear, right is logarithmic; units on both is number of samples. Throw in bandwidth synthesis, and it's filled out pretty out to 100 lambda. Absolute max length is 150 lambda (at 150 MHz), since the cables are fixed at 150 m.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Chris Carilli <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

   might be nice to have imaging config have longer baselines, ie
   larger radius, but that might not be possible given cable lengths?
   cc



   On 07/01/2015 03:38 PM, Jonathan Pober wrote:
    Based on further discussion on Monday's data telecon, I have
    another iteration of a HERA 19 configuration proposal.  We need a
    final decision by early next week, so tomorrow's telecon is a good
    time to reach consensus.  I will be late, unfortunately, but
    that's no reason to postpone discussion.

    A summary of changes from Version 2:

      * The polarization dipole rotation experiment (red) now rotates
        the same dipoles in each column (as opposed to a staggered
        scheme).
      * The PAPER 19 hex (purple) has been moved to the east side of
        the future HERA core.  This was due to concerns over shadowing
        from the HERA 19 elements.  The hex outriggers (orange) have
        been shifted to match.
      * Similarly, the 9 (formerly pink) dipoles that were positioned
        near HERA 19 have been eliminated.  Suspicion was that
        shadowing would make these baselines too difficult to interpret.
      * There are now 38 dipoles in the imaging configuration
        (green).  Other configurations besides a circle have been
suggested, but no pressing need seemed to necessitate it. Currently, the single-frequency, snapshot uv coverage is
        nearly filled to 50 lambda, with good coverage out to 75-100
        lambda.

    Concerns:

      * The two eastern most orange hex outriggers likely cannot be
        reached with 150 m cable.  Do we still want the hex outriggers
        if we can't place all of them?
      * I still have not checked for any position conflicts with the
        correlator container or receiverators, but by eye we seem OK.

    Jonnie




Reply via email to