are there dropouts or resonances at higher spectral resolution? what is the resolution of the measurements?

thanks
chris


On 10/07/2015 09:25 AM, Eloy de Lera Acedo wrote:
Hi Danny,

We are looking into that requirement now. The 60 MHz ripple is due to the nature of the LPDA antenna, it gives us very high sensitivity across band at the expense of that ripple. It is important to keep in mind though that this effect gets averaged out if you integrate the whole field of view as it is a pattern dependent and we are talking about a +/- 45 degrees FoV here.

Eloy.

On 7 Oct 2015, at 16:21, danny jacobs <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Eloy,

Is there a goal in mind for the flatness of the passband? At the moment it looks fairly dominated by the ~60MHz (16ns) ripple but its kind of hard to tell if there is faster stuff in there at a smaller level.

Cheers,
~Danny

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Eloy de Lera Acedo <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi John,

    Do you mean the feature at 100 MHz? That one is not predicted by
    the modeling and indeed it is very strange because it does not
    show up in the other polarisation. We will check with our
    Australian colleagues, see what they think. That should not be
    there.

    The reason why the A/T measurements give larger values than the
    model can be related to this:

    "For Hydra A, our model predicts the flux density at 300 MHz to
    be ∼1/3 that at 74 MHz. However, detailed measurements
    specifically targeting Hydra A at 74 and 330 MHz [35] show that
    the flux density of the compact central region reduces less
    steeply with frequency, and would be only ∼1/2 that at 74 MHz.
    Unlike the surrounding diffuse emission, the compact central
    region is not spatially filtered at the higher frequencies, thus
    our modelled "known" flux density causes an underestimate of the
    actual flux density, resulting in a higher than actual A/T . In
    future processing of measurement, we expect significant
    convergence as the models of calibrator sources are improved for
    the MWA and other wide-band low-frequency telescopes."

    Regarding A/T, in this paper (Fig. 15) you have our best
    estimates for A/T calculation for SKA before re-baselining
    (before halving the number of elements).

    http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10686-015-9439-0

    Cheers,
    Eloy.

    On 7 Oct 2015, at 15:31, Jonathan Pober
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I'm not used to thinking about A/T this early in the morning,
    but are Figures 14 and 15 what we've always wanted to see from
    the SKA?  Measured (and simulated) frequency responses?

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01515

    (There seems to be a prevalance of 15's here, which
    numerology.com <http://numerology.com/> tells me corresponds
    to "Loving, forgiving, tolerant" -- for those of you perhaps
    looking for guidance in your relation to the SKA.)

    In Figure 14 there are a few sharp features beyond what the
    model predicts.  I need to read the paper in more detail to
    figure out exactly what the measurement is.  Those could be due
    to sidelobes from other sources affecting their spatial filter,
    although they are using the full 128 tiles of the MWA for cross
    correlation, so the PSF should be good.  They're also stitching
    together the band from several 30.72 MHz chunks, so those could
    be artifacts at band edges.

Maybe Eloy and/or Nima have some thoughts on these results? Very nice to see this work taking place and moving ahead.

    Cheers,

    Jonnie

-- *Dr. Eloy de Lera Acedo*

    *Senior Research Associate*
    Astrophysics Group
    Cavendish Laboratory
    University of Cambridge
    JJ Thomson Avenue
    Cambridge CB3 0HE

    *Teaching Associate and Bye-Fellow*
    Downing College
    Regent Street
    Cambridge CB2 1DQ

    Telephone: (+44) (0)1223 (3)37365
    Fax: (+44) (0)1223 337563 <tel:%28%2B44%29%20%280%291223%20337563>
    Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Webpage: http://eloydeleraacedo.weebly.com
    <http://eloydeleraacedo.weebly.com/>




--

National Science Foundation Fellow
Arizona State University
School of Earth and Space Exploration
Low Frequency Cosmology
Phone:           (505) 500 4521
Homepage: http://loco.lab.asu.edu/danny_jacobs/

--
*Dr. Eloy de Lera Acedo*

*Senior Research Associate*
Astrophysics Group
Cavendish Laboratory
University of Cambridge
JJ Thomson Avenue
Cambridge CB3 0HE

*Teaching Associate and Bye-Fellow*
Downing College
Regent Street
Cambridge CB2 1DQ

Telephone: (+44) (0)1223 (3)37365
Fax: (+44) (0)1223 337563
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Webpage: http://eloydeleraacedo.weebly.com


Reply via email to