as i mentioned earlier, saleem said that the limits were "PAPER-like", so nothing revolutionarily new... he also mentioned moving back to the power spectrum statistic, in lieu of the variance, since the foregrounds were easier to deal with...
> On 03.12.2015., at 14.30, Adam Beardsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > mK >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:30 AM Jonathan Pober <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> 20 or 30 mK or mK^2? >> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Adrian Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes. They have both P(kperp,kpara) limits as well as P(k) limits. No >>> mention of the variance method today. >>> >>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 9:42 PM, danny jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> But this is a power spectrum limit rather than with the variance method? >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, Saul Kohn <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> To follow this up, Ger made a LOFAR EoR project overview presentation >>>>> (probably the same one as Dave was mentioning) in Albuquerque this >>>>> afternoon. >>>>> >>>>> They were hazy on the details of power spectrum estimation from their >>>>> images, but he quoted *preliminary* limits of between 20 and 30mK for >>>>> redshifts 7.5 to 10, k~0.05 Mpc^-1 using 155 hours of data. Their >>>>> estimate on systematics comes from Stokes V, which was at levels ~ 10mK, >>>>> so intersecting with the higher-power EoR models. On the slide it quoted >>>>> "Zaroubi et al. 2016", so I guess we can expect to see something official >>>>> next year. >>>>> >>>>> Saul >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, DAVID DEBOER <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> To clarify a bit, I’m not sure that Michiel’s statement applies to >>>>>> anything new, but rather that there was some possibility that Ger had >>>>>> made a presentation somewhere regarding a limit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
