I think a model in which we can say that noise and resolution were set using HERA and assuming we can remove the continuum would be a lot more convincing to a referee than using some fake and saying 'the peaks are 10sigma'. and Peter has done such modeling. as for making it a strip, i think that would be straight forward doing a few sequential fields and using standard mosaic sofware. peter could probably do this in a matter of a few days?

cc



On 01/28/2016 12:03 PM, danny jacobs wrote:
Here are some other options that address most of the comments.

Aaron, I played with making the foreground strip smaller, but without the broader context of the galaxy it was hard to tell the context of the field on the sky. I've played with the positioning of things to try and squeeze things a bit more.


About the 'simulations'
Its actually not even a model. Since time was of the essence I used an algorithm that makes non-gaussian random fields. To make it look right, I compared with the actual instrumental simulation to match up the minimum and maximum size scales.







On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Chris Carilli <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Is this a real image put through the HERA configuration/sampling then
    imaged and mosaiced etc... or just the model?

    cc


    > Neat.
    >
    > Minor tweak: shift the hour angle so that the HERA stripe is in the
    > center.
    > That has the additional benefit of making the galactic plane passage
    > through the HERA declination contiguous.
    >
    > You might want to denote the HERA core synthesized beam size at
    z=7 and
    > z=10. What scale do you smooth to?
    >
    > I'd put z=10 above z=7 so it reads going down chronologically.
    >
    > Also, any reason why we use 8 degrees rather than 10?
    >
    > -Josh
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:46 PM, danny jacobs
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Hi Proposers,
    >>
    >> I've replaced the imaging figure with the new figure (attached) as
    >> discussed on the telecon. I played with a few of the other options
    >> suggested on the telecon, but liked this one best. It takes up
    three
    >> inches
    >> of page. I can shrink it to two if necessary.
    >> Thoughts welcome.
    >>
    >> Cheers,
    >> ~Danny
    >>
    >> --
    >> ================================================================
    >> Daniel C. Jacobs
    >> KE7DHQ
    >> National Science Foundation Fellow
    >> Arizona State University
    >> School of Earth and Space Exploration
    >> Low Frequency Cosmology
    >> Phone: (505) 500 4521 <tel:%28505%29%20500%204521>
    >> Homepage: http://loco.lab.asu.edu/danny_jacobs/
    >> MWA: mwatelescope.org <http://mwatelescope.org>
    >> HERA: reionization.org <http://reionization.org>
    >> PAPER: eor.berkeley.edu <http://eor.berkeley.edu>
    >>
    >





--
================================================================
Daniel C. Jacobs                                   KE7DHQ
National Science Foundation Fellow
Arizona State University
School of Earth and Space Exploration
Low Frequency Cosmology
Phone: (505) 500 4521 <tel:%28505%29%20500%204521>
Homepage: http://loco.lab.asu.edu/danny_jacobs/
MWA: mwatelescope.org <http://mwatelescope.org>
HERA: reionization.org <http://reionization.org>
PAPER: eor.berkeley.edu <http://eor.berkeley.edu>

Reply via email to