<quote who="Brendan O'Connor"> > I, for one, would like to continue working on the PIP. I was, before all > this came up, working on several extensions; now I've postponed them in > favor of code that doesn't look like it'll get pitched if a vote goes > the wrong way. > > That said, I'm not a committer, so I don't get a vote.
You get a non-binding vote, it doesn't count in terms of the result of a vote, but 10 positive favour votes from non-committers can sway those that are, especially in terms of community interest like here. Gav... > > ---Brendan O'Connor > > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Recordon, David wrote: >>> Woah Ted, VeriSign has never said we're out if the project continues. >>> I just have serious doubts that the project could continue without >>> JanRain. >> >> I wondered that too when I read Ted's comments; I didn't get that out of >> your earlier posts. >> >> I don't think anyone expects JanRain's source code to persist in their >> absence. The question: is what do the remaining developers wish to >> collaborate on? Since no developers have spoken up in the past two >> weeks >> or so, my running assumption is, 'nothing'. >> >> If the developers of specific code or implementations want to speak up >> that they want to continue development on specific code bases here in >> the Heraldry project, it would clear up allot of confusion, and if there >> are sufficient developers who speak up, I'd certainly reverse my vote. >> >> Bill >> > -- Gav...
