+1 for Merb (with DataMapper) support. More generally, Rack support (so I can run Merb, Sinatra, etc.) would be ideal, although my guess is that it's much harder to generalize the database layer than the web layer, and since these frameworks are ORM- agnostic, this might prove to be more tricky.
-Mirko On Aug 29, 11:16 am, ab5tract <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would love to see Heroku provide a Rack / framework agnostic option. > I haven't logged in to Heroku since I decided Rails wasn't where I > wanted to invest my time. No offense. I love Heroku though and would > gladly jump back in if I were able to use some other frameworks. > > On Aug 29, 1:57 pm, Christian Hoeppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Just get a Rack runner. That would get most of today's ruby frameworks > > running without any overhead. > > > But then, stability and rails come first ;) > > > On 29/08/2008, at 4:17, Mark wrote: > > > > Stability, SSL, cron, long running processes, etc first.....then sure > > > >> Quick straw poll: who > > >> else is interested in being able to run Merb, or some other Ruby > > >> framework, on Heroku? > > > >> Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
