That's how we do it :)

You also get other nice stuff, rss feeds for commits and stuff

On Dec 1, 5:55 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I followed your example but when pushing the
> branch to heroku my webapp isn't changed (so far so good) but i do see
> the application restarting. This worries me and I still can't push to
> heroku during office hours when my client is working on the app.
>
> So I signed up for github like you said. this is going to be the
> central repository where all my and my colleagues commits get pushed
> and when I want to deploy on heroku I push to heroku from my local
> repository. Does this sound allright to you?
>
> On 1 dec, 16:56, albemuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You can also have a development branch and push it to heroku. The app
> > in production is tied to the master branch, so commit/push to the dev
> > branch and once you're happy, merge with master and push to see it in
> > production.
>
> > Something like this
>
> > git branch dev
> > git checkout dev
> > ...make changes...
> > git commit -a
> > git push origin dev
>
> > BTW github is giving away a free month for it's paid accounts, highly
> > recommend you try it
>
> >http://github.com/blog/247-cyber-monday-sale
>
> > On Dec 1, 3:35 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On 1 dec, 01:14, "Josh Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I'm also new 
> > > to git, rails, etc.  git is entirely different than
> > > > subversion..  
>
> > > Yes i noticed
> > > if you haven't already, read up on distributed source> control.
>
> > > I have
> > >  > I've got git installed, and when I commit, it commits to my local> git 
> > > repository.  I think that's how git always works.
> > > Agree
> > > >  You then push changes
> > > > to heroku when ready.  actually, I'm pushing to unfuddle as my offsite
> > > > repo.  I haven't yet, but I will later push to Heroku to deploy it.
>
> > > Yes ok so you have a central repository on another place (unfuddle)
> > > than heroku and deploy to heroku from there.
>
> > > > -j
>
> > > > Josh | [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL 
> > > > PROTECTED]>|http://computeristsolutions.comhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuacoffman|http://twitter.com/joshcoffman
>
> > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
>
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > I'm new to Heroku and just getting used to git and ruby on rails. My
> > > > > background is Java EE and subversion. I'm planning to create an
> > > > > application for a customer of mine on heroku. it is a little
> > > > > administrative application.
>
> > > > > I noticed that when I am editing code online it shows immediately in
> > > > > "production" this is not i want especially not after deploying version
> > > > > 1.0 of my app.
>
> > > > > So i made a working copy on my laptop and edited some sources and
> > > > > pushed it back to heroku. Instead of just committing, the database got
> > > > > changed and my app got restarted. This was much more than i intended
> > > > > to do. I just wanted to commit not deploy my changes.
>
> > > > > I am used to a very controlled cycle from development to production
> > > > > and  for now i would like to stick with that what is the preferred way
> > > > > of working with heroku?
>
> > > > > Do I have to create a git repository on a server for my team and push
> > > > > to that repository when they want to share code. and when i want to
> > > > > deploy i push from that repository to heroku?
>
> > > > > Thanks anyway,
>
> > > > > Joris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Heroku" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to