Carson, Rarely is the problem of performance due to the language. I would suggest using something like New Relic (http://newrelic.com/) to look at the performance of your application. More than likely you have a query that is poorly formed or you are passing back to much data or ... Check out RPM
Carl On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Max A <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm, from what I can tell Ruby 1.9 is at most 2-4x faster, which is a > fair bit but nothing like an order of magnitude or something. If > you're having performance issues, I think Ruby 1.9 will only help, not > fix them, and probably only help temporarily. > > Besides, adding another, faster Ruby interpreter would mean more > complexity for them and fewer dynos needed for you :P > > On May 14, 1:37 am, Carson Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 vote for Ruby 1.9 on Heroku. >> >> I know that having 1.8.6/7 is still required, but having the >> capability to launch our apps with 1.9 would be very, very nice. Not >> sure how feasible this would be in Heroku's "cloud." >> >> From what I am told, there is a huge performance boost over 1.8, which >> is what I desperately need in my app. 900-1500ms response times and >> largely due to ruby (I think) is just no good. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
