Have you tried putting the gem in your .gems file instead?

I know that works well for rails (just specify rails -v 2.3.3 for  
example), but haven't tried it with rubygems myself.

Oren

On Jul 29, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Nick Quaranto wrote:

>
> Hey folks, I'm wondering if Rubygems could get upgraded on the Heroku
> systems to 1.3.3 or greater, the latest version (1.3.5) would be best.
> Gemcutter ( http://gemcutter.org ) depends on the latest version, and
> currently I'm getting around that by tossing the code in my lib
> directory and requiring in what I need to override it. However,
> something is definitely going wrong with that when trying to push to
> gemcutter (see the segfault?):
>
> ==> log/server_33403_23bb188_e4eb_54790.log <==
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/lib/
> action_controller/vendor/rack-1.0/rack.rb:17: warning: already
> initialized constant VERSION
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:193: warning: already initialized constant MUTEX
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:195: warning: already initialized constant
> RubyGemsPackageVersion
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:207: warning: already initialized constant
> WIN_PATTERNS
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:1078: warning: already initialized constant
> MARSHAL_SPEC_DIR
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:1083: warning: already initialized constant
> YAML_SPEC_DIR
> ./lib/rubygems/platform.rb:171: warning: already initialized constant
> RUBY
> ./lib/rubygems/platform.rb:177: warning: already initialized constant
> CURRENT
> ./lib/rubygems/source_index.rb:587: warning: already initialized
> constant Cache
> ./lib/rubygems/version.rb:246: warning: already initialized constant
> Requirement
> ./lib/rubygems/version.rb:36: [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11) [x86_64-linux]
>
>>> Thin web server (v1.0.1 codename ?)
>>> Maximum connections set to 1024
>>> Listening on 0.0.0.0:54790, CTRL+C to stop
> /usr/local/bin/thin_launcher: line 5: 19862 Aborted
> thin -p $1 -e $RACK_ENV -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start >$2 2>&1
>
>
> The strange part is that pushing was working a few days ago, this
> seems to be a relatively recent issue. I think upgrading to the latest
> recommended version of Rubygems is a good decision overall and I'd
> like to make sure that this isn't the cause for this bug. Thanks!
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Heroku" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to