Neil said:
> I host loads of apps on 1 web dyno and just make sure that the spin up time 
> is short enough that it's not a problem.

Neil and others, thanks.

I just launched a new (beta) app, and the response time is just
horrible.

Could you pass a few tips on how to "make sure that the spin up time
is short enough"?
Thanks!!!

ed


On Feb 17, 7:48 am, Neil Middleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm confused here.
>
> The 'starter' package is only ~$35/mo which isn't exactly monumentally 
> expensive.  Are you suggesting something between that and free?
> What you're suggesting sounds like your charged by the CPU cycle rather than 
> the hours?
>
> To be brutally honest, I host loads of apps on 1 web dyno and just make sure 
> that the spin up time is short enough that it's not a problem.  If I ever 
> need to run more than 1 web dyno it's generally because the traffic levels 
> require it, in which case $35 becomes less of a problem.
>
> Personally, I think that having a single dyno, which can still serve hundreds 
> of thousands of requests a day /for free/ is a pretty good deal.  I'm happy 
> to pay $35 to double it.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, 17 February 2012 at 12:44, Nick wrote:
> > Peter,
>
> > I take your points well. I don't mean to try and 'do one over' on
> > Heroku. I appreciate the service you offer very much. My thinking
> > behind it was that you would never exceed the 450 hours of dyno time
> > allocated to each app so there wouldn't be a problem and if you did
> > you would be charged anyway.
>
> > Is there a paid for solution from Heroku to achieve the same result?
> > The cost jump between 1 free dyno and paying for a dyno is quite large
> > for small applications. So perhaps you could offer a $10 package which
> > essentialy works the same way? If i'm honest I don't feel I pay Heroku
> > enough but I have too many small apps (10 or so) to pay for each one
> > to have a dedicated dyno.
>
> > ?
> > On Feb 16, 8:39 pm, Peter van Hardenberg <[email protected] 
> > (http://heroku.com)> wrote:
> > > As a database guy at Heroku, I'm not one to speak authoritatively on
> > > this, so please take this as the personal thoughts of someone and not
> > > an official statement.
>
> > > We idle apps in order to avoid having to charge for them. The more
> > > people who prevent this behaviour, the more expensive our "free" apps
> > > become to run, and the more likely we are to have to change our
> > > policies about what we can offer in a free app.
>
> > > While I admire the ingenuity in this post, I would suggest that you
> > > reduce the amount of time your application takes to boot, or simply
> > > accept that a few seconds of lag on the first request after a period
> > > of idleness is a reasonable trade-off for free web hosting.
>
> > > Peter
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Heroku" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected]).
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected]).
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Heroku" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.

Reply via email to