I think maintaining a decoupling of application configuration and domain name specification is desirable for a general purpose platform, but the use-case is reasonable. Thanks for the feedback -- do send along your feedback when the new functionality comes out, whenever that is. :)
-p On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Carson Gross <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes sense, I can hack that. > > I think a potentially good solution would be to allow sub-domain isolation > of web workers for an app. It's a pretty common pattern to split out your > app along sub-domains (e.g. api.foo.com vs app.foo.com) which have > different access patterns/performance requirements and need perf isolation > from one another. Of course, the devil is in the details and maybe that > ends up being a terrible idea to implement, but it's exactly what I'd like > right now. :) > > Thanks, > Carson > > On Friday, August 24, 2012 4:55:09 PM UTC-7, Peter van Hardenberg wrote: > >> We do kinda-sorta support it, but it currently has a limitation in the >> form that if we ever need to update your DATABASE_URL, we can't tell that >> you're connecting from two apps and one of them (the non-owning app) will >> go unupdated. We've got a feature in alpha right now which will resolve >> this, but I don't believe it's ready for external users yet. >> >> In conclusion: go ahead, but it's grody, and we're hoping it will be >> better soon. >> >> -p >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Carson Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey Everyone, >>> >>> I'm going to be running two heroku apps with the same backing database >>> (I want request isolation between the API and the web application so that >>> if I screw the web application up from a perf perspective it won't back up >>> the API.) >>> >>> It seems pretty simple to do this: >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/5981508/share-** >>> database-between-2-apps-in-**heroku<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5981508/share-database-between-2-apps-in-heroku> >>> >>> and it seems like Heroku kinda-sorta considers it a supported >>> configuration. >>> >>> Anyone have comments on and/or experience with it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Carson >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Heroku" group. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> heroku+un...@**googlegroups.com >>> >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/**group/heroku?hl=en_US?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en_US?hl=en> >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Heroku" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en_US?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en_US?hl=en
