> P.S. While I'm writing: Is there a summary of the differences between > Hessian 1 and 2, without having to study the specs? Are there reasons to > choose either in a specific environment? >
Hessian 2 includes mainly optimizations that can reduce the size of the encodings - so therefore you need to to have a Hessian 2 encoder to create the binaries and a Hessian 2 decoder in order to correctly read the optimized encoding. A Hessian 2 implementation *should* theoretically be able to read Hessian 1 input (apart from the protocol version in the header). The reason to choose between one or another is based on the languages you want to interact with - if you have a Java server using Hessian 2, this may be a problem if your client written in language X only supports Hessian 1. Therefore you have 2 choices - use a common version, or improve the language X library to support Hessian 2. HTH, Ben _______________________________________________ hessian-interest mailing list [email protected] http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/hessian-interest
