On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Ben Hood wrote: > Hi all, > > I've created a performance benchmark for an experimental extension to > Hessian 2: > http://hopper.squarespace.com/blog/2008/3/1/type-negotiation-in-hessian.html > > As explained in the article, the motivation behind the benchmark is > show a potential gain in efficiency of the protocol. > > As this is the first of a 2-part series, this part concentrates on the > general motivation behind the type negotiation extension. > > There will be a follow up piece that will go into detail about the > extension looks like from a protocol perspective.
That looks very nice. I'd think you'd see the same benefits if the types were handled lazily, just by making the transmission scope explicit and extending it beyond the call/reply. That would keep the redundancy improvements in your proposal, but simplify any spec documentation and implementation. My guess would be that the benchmark numbers would be identical with the lazy typing. Assuming we can come up with a simple extension, I'd think this scope could be added to the Hessian 2.0 spec itself. It's about time for us to clean the spec up and submit it to the IETF. -- Scott > > > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > hessian-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/hessian-interest _______________________________________________ hessian-interest mailing list [email protected] http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/hessian-interest
