Thanks so much... I'm planning on working with Roy on a few more projects 
probably a lot more challenging than the Tolley plans and take a lot longer . 
The Tolley plans are very easy, I did add 4 extra keys to get a larger scale.  
I also have a professional instrument on order and should have it in a few 
months so I'm anxious to get playing on a regular basis..  My wife now wants to 
play also after we went to the gathering in San Antonio so I'll be ordering 
another gurdy for her soon... cheers, Seth

Chris Nogy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Good job, Seth.

As one who built from nothing but a vibrating string measurement and some vague 
memories of a few actual gurdies, (no mentoring, no book, not even plans), and 
still came up with a playable instrument, I can tell you that this is something 
I think you should be proud of.

It's not rocket science, but there are a lot of variables (my sinphone shows 
the scars of changing so many of them repeatedly) and it takes an admirable 
dedication and some respectable skill to go through all of that.

On the plus side, I think now you probably know more about these instruments 
generically, the technology and the effects that things internal and external 
have on them, than most of the players out there, and this understanding can 
only help you play better and make your instruments (yours or built by someone 
else) sound their best.

Admirable work

Chris Nogy

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 2/13/2007 at 1:45 PM Roy Trotter wrote:

>Another of the many delightful things about the weekend in San Antonio:
>Seth brought his first HG. It was made from
>the Tolley plans and/or book. It plays. No flower planter here. I am
>given to understand that's pretty rare, for someone to make a Hurdy
>Gurdy, that acualy plays, alone, isolated as so many of us are. (it
>took "3 men and a horse" to get mine started) SO, let's have another
>round of applause, please.
>
>Thanks,
>Roy




Reply via email to