I remember dealing with that a few months ago Chris requested I repost.
Read it and weep <g>:
--- Chris Nogy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:16:20 -0600
> From: "Chris Nogy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fwd: Re: [HG] OTW photos, deWit scale length, and a few
> other
>   snide comments.
> 
> This actually clearer than mud explanation might come in handy now,
> if you would choose to re-post it to the list...
> 
> Chris Nogy
> 
> 
> 
> *********** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***********
> 
> On 9/27/2006 at 9:41 PM Roy Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >Thanks. I found it!!! I was looking for something else entirely, and
> >stumbled on it.  I found also a rather oblique,tanilizing hint...
> >"The angle of the wheel and it's distance from the tuning pin box
> are
> >of utmost impotance. The distance is important because this provides
> >the scale of the instrument -the length of the vibrating string -
> >(huh?) and  it must be exactly 343 mm. "
> >
> >So he (them) is (are) perhaps telling us that the distance of the
> wheel
> >is 343mm from the pin- box. ,,, for entirely the wrong reasons.  And
> >the bridge,
> >(distance between which and the nut  determines v.l.) must be the
> same
> >distance  by distance of an extrapolation of where the "sliding" nut
> >SHOULD be. I'm thinking about getting an accurate measure of the
> >tangent centers and back-applying the Rule of 18.
> >Much more Helpful is a line from page 17 from
> >www.hurdygurdy.com/info/dutch.htm  "Place it with the headward side
> 343
> >mm from the nut position. " That would be the Sliding
> nut...OOO...OOO I
> >get it. Take 1/2 of 343. Measure from the octave make a mark
> (default
> >nut position) and come out 343 again. There's yer Bridge and Bob's
> your
> >Uncle.
> >
> >The trompette and bourdon  nut IS the facing wall of the pin bridge
> so
> >statements like "The trompette string length is 400mm." "The bourdon
> >string lengths are 415mm. " are crystaline.
> >
> >THANK YOU,  DOCTOR HACKMANN. I'll admit I was looking prety glum
> myself
> >for awhile
> >
> >--- Alden Hackmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hey, Roy -
> >>
> >> Of course we all look glum - no Roy!
> >>
> >> If you don't have your answer by the time I get home, I'll look up
> my
> >>
> >> DeWit.
> >>
> >> Alden F.M. Hackmann                       
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> "Beati illi qui in circulum circumeunt, fient enim magnae rotae."
> >>
> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Roy Trotter wrote:
> >>
> >> > Welcome home, everyone! I went to the OTW homepage, saw the
> >> > Photos....everyone looks so glum of expressionless...did you
> miss
> >> me
> >> > THAT MUCH?   ( Yes , as a matter of fact I DO think that song is
> >> about
> >> > me...don't you? )
> >> > "But thats not what I'm to talk about I'm here to talk about"
> ...
> >> > DEWIT.
> >> >
> >> > CAVEAT: what follows is about luthierie, on Hurdy Gurdies, on a
> >> > specific design of hurdy gurdy. So if yer bored or annoyed by
> such
> >> > things, IGNORE, DELETE or otherwise buzz off. But don't just sit
> >> there
> >> > and gripe about people seriously discussing Hurdy Gurdies on a
> >> Hurdy
> >> > Gurdy list, go spend some quality time with yor cat or your
> child,
> >> or
> >> > your orchids, ....or something.
> >> >
> >> > I took vacation this week with the idea of reviving "Lil Doorit"
> so
> >> I'd
> >> > have something to play while I attempt, yet again. to repair the
> >> crack
> >> > in my luteback.
> >> > I'm to the fitting-the-soundboard stage and want to make a few
> >> scratchy
> >> > marks on the soundbound while I can still see where the
> top-braces
> >> are.
> >> >
> >> > I can"t find my DEWIT, Botermans (et al) book, and I can't
> remember
> >> the
> >> > scale length, so If you have the chanterelle bride placement, or
> >> know
> >> > it, pipe up.  I also will need the placement of the drone and
> dog
> >> > bridges.
> >> > I measured from the peghead wall to the tail facing end of that
> >> brace
> >> > 30.5 mm and/or 15 & 3/16 " which leads to the other question:
> >> > There was a discussion at one point about the tail-side of the
> >> bridge
> >> > was best at  1/4 inch behind that brace ( I think).  If anybody
> >> > remembers that, I would be grateful for having my memory
> refreshed.
> >> >
> >> > OK, I'm done, the rest of y'all.  Welcome back.
> >> >
> >> > Later,
> >> >
> >> > Roy T.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> 
> *********** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***********
> 
> 

Reply via email to