Re: [HG] Re: hurdy gurdy kits...or the DIY fanatics folly. I agree - but be 
cautious.  You can buy a cheap violin or guitar and still sound pretty good.  
The instrument will work and make music particularly if you have some training. 
 If you get a super cheap HG,  it may not work at all and it may never work 
even if you have some training.  I gave an intro to the HG workshop two years 
ago and at the end of it two people brought up their HG's which they couldn't 
play hoping that I could help them.  I shimmed, cottoned, rosined but basically 
the instruments needed a lot more work. One had a really funky wheel and the 
other - well, I don't know exactly what was going on but none of strings hit 
the wheel where they should.  A professional builder could probably have 
explained why they didn't play - but I do think the advice might still have 
been - start over.  So yes,  there's certainly a range of tonality but there 
are a lot of things that need to be done right to make the things actually play 
at all.   A lot of antique instruments are like this.  I recently bought a very 
cheap shawm - great deal I thought.  Well,  it requires so much breath to play, 
its completely unstable and then it cracked.  Its useless.  With antique 
instruments, if you get too cheap, too imprecisely made - you get firewood and 
that line between firewood and playable instrument is a lot closer than modern 
instruments.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chris Nogy 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 10:14 AM
  Subject: Re[2]: [HG] Re: hurdy gurdy kits...or the DIY fanatics folly.


  You hit on it exactly in your last statement.  The gurdy comes in many 
flavors, they have tonal differences, but the differences are not as many as 
the similarities.  And for those who have spent a lifetime learning to play a 
gurdy, they have come to know the sounds and tonal components that make a gurdy 
a gurdy.  Those sounds and tonal components come from years of tradition, from 
the way the instrument was steered throughout the ages.  People here give their 
recomendations according to the playability, the agility, the usability of the 
instruments in a performance venue.  They compare them to the work of the 
Hackmans, to Nagy, to the other really fine builders instruments, and they are 
trying to get people not to settle for something limited by design, but to 
assure folks get a world of gurdy opportunity.  They want you to have the best 
tool for the job.  And in that respect, they are usually quite right about kits 
and plans.

  You can buy a cheap violin from China, and if you are lucky and get a 
professional to set it up, you can play the violin parts of a piece 
recognizably, and even sound something like a violin.  But even if you are the 
finest virtuoso in the world, the music you produce is both from your skill and 
from the instrument, and a surprising amount of what comes out comes from the 
instrument without you telling it to.

  So the cheap violin will work for lots of things, but it will never make your 
musical experience what it could be with a much finer insturment.

  The gurdy is not simply a droned, wheel driven stringed instrument - that is 
a mechano-agitated droned chordophone.  The gurdy is different from, say, 
Dennis Havelena's $20 hurdy gurdy like object.  My sinphone is a sort-of gurdy, 
it doesn't have the soul of a great instrument but it does OK in renn faire and 
other cheesy demo applications.  It makes a drony, stringy sound that is 
recognizable as belonging to the gurdy family, but it is not a great instrument 
(or, I would imagine some here would say, even a very good one).  But I am 
happy with it the way every mother is happy with their own child, it is the 
brightest, most handsome, most gifted thing around.  But I am biased.

  Yes, you can make an instrument you can play from many of these kits and 
plans.  But it will almost assuredly never give you what a professional 
instrument will give you.  But it will give you something a professional 
instrument will not.  You will know things after you build your first 
instrument that most players don't ever get to know.  And if you pay attention, 
and are willing to experiment with your first child, as it were, then your 
second, and maybe third, and even further if you are so inclined, you CAN end 
up with a really nice instrument, and great knowledge, and you will be ahead.  
But it will cost you, cost in time, visits to builders to learn, materials, 
used up favors, the disgust of your house pets after listening to your 
squawking, squeaking experiments every day.  It will cost you more than you 
would simply pay for an instrument.  But that past earns you something more 
than just an instrument, so in many ways, it is simply worth it.

  If you are that kind of person - bright, mechanically talented, dedicated and 
focused, a touch of massochism and sadism.

  Just my 2 cents worth

  Chris

  Now comes more learning questions.


  *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

  On 2/3/2008 at 10:10 PM Marsbar wrote:
    I can see what you mean.  The tone is very thin and lacks substance (no 
bark ;-] ).  But it is all about expectations.  If I go to see an Adam Sandler 
movie I go with low expectations and occasionally I get pleasantly surprised 
even though there are still cringeworthy moments.  

     

    It is possible that even the kit model could have a use in a group scenario 
especially to add colour in a medieval faire setting.  The lack of the 
trompette wouldn't be as important if other members are maintaining the rhythm. 
And those of you who know what it should sound like can wander off to the other 
end of the faire and drown your sorrows with some mulled ale ;-].

     

    Fi

     

    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douwe Boschma
    Sent: Sunday, 3 February 2008 9:25 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [HG] Re: hurdy gurdy kits...or the DIY fanatics folly.

     

    Kit obsession? I don't think that it is a strange question for someone new. 
You have IKEA, model aeroplanes even whole houses that come as a kit. Not all 
are of bad quality either. But asking around and researching I found out that 
building an instrument is more critical. Kinds and quality of wood used. Glue 
that is provided, the way it has been sawed, instruction, the patience and 
precision of the builder etc. Still it is a good thing to ask around if you 
don't know about something.

    My first objective was to save money but still looking for a proper 
instrument. At the end I have ordered one from a builder which will be finished 
at the end of this year.  

    But well. The most convincing thing might be your own ears. Here it is... 
The music maker kit... finished:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKM_99Y0KME

    ;-)

    Douwe



Reply via email to