Also Florida and parts of South America so unlikely to have been used that 
early.
Also used to treat a very anti-social disease.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaiacum_officinale

First introduced to Europe in 1508.
See http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Guaiacum
No idea what they would have used before that (all the other references on 
Google for medieval wood bearings turned up as from this list!
It's an interesting speculation as to what would have been used prior to this.
Ebony? Bone or Ivory?
As the crusade would have resulted in many woods etc being brought home, I 
suppose something from the Middle East (oak or holly from the UK perhaps - or 
one of the harder fruit woods)?
(Trying to think of a hard wood now). Would Olive wood be too soft?
Gosh, it's an interesting subject.
Colin Hill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chris Nogy 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:56 PM
  Subject: Re[4]: [HG] purpose of my new project.


  The bearings are already prepared, Lignum Vitae (from my oldest stock, 4 
pieces that made up a shaft bearing in an old steamship.  This wood is 
pressure, oil and steam 'seasoned', and is tough and stable.  I made a roofing 
hammer head out of a piece, had to use metal milling equipment to make the 
hammer head, and used it through a whole season of building a large addition on 
my parents house.  It was an amazing hammer - it is now the property of a close 
friend who still uses it to this day.

  I have some new Lignum Vitae on the shelves for not-so-critical projects, but 
this one gets only the very best.

  Was Lignum Vitae a European wood available at that time?  I thought it was 
indigneous to the West Indes, so at that time (The late 1300s - early 1400s in 
Europe it probably would not have been known.  I was thinking perhaps oil 
soaked linden or ash, as both were strong and common woods of the time, might 
have been used as bearings.  I will use Lignum Vitae because it maintains the 
spirit of the build, and I think that it will start out similar to what might 
have been used, only maintain that standard longer.

  Again, I am not going for the experience of being a medieval owner of a 
medieval instrument.  I want the sound experience, and I want to be able to 
maintain that experience over time without a lifetime of mechanical maintenance.

  Chris


  *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

  On 2/7/2008 at 9:02 AM Reymen Marc wrote:
    Doing this and wanting only the best, I think you MUST use lignum vitae 
bearings...like in those days...
    marc
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Chris Nogy 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:45 PM
      Subject: Re[2]: [HG] purpose of my new project.


      I will likely build with a laminated wheel.  I know by firsthand 
experience what a solid maple wheel can sound like when true, and what it can 
sound like when off.  And if it is rosined properly, the end/edge grain 
difference is minimal.

      I fear I have been misunderstood - I fear people think I am after the 
shabby, almost unlistenable sound of the average early peasant gurdy.  I don't 
think that all medieval instruments had to sound bad, in fact, I believe that 
just like today there were all sorts of levels of instruments and builders, and 
that there was a Nagy or a Hackmann back then, doing exceptional work with the 
materials and techniques available, and turning out exceptional instruments 
limited only because the technology of the time didn't include all the adjunce 
techniques we now can use to further mold the sound of a good instrument.

      My point in all this being that it was possible to have a good, or even 
great, sounding instrument in the middle ages, but we tend to spend a lot of 
time learning how to make changes to an instruments tone by materials choice, 
preparation (top carving and using depth calipers to perfect every thickness, 
nylon or roller bearings, things like that).  The technology available in 
period could produce a very precise machine.  But it would be limited to a 
certain type of sound because builders had not yet discovered all the adjunct 
technologies that we use today to affect and fine tune the instruments.  These 
options simply were not available in earlier times.

      Thus my question about curved vs flat top.  There is a significant 
difference in the sound between the two.  If the curved top would have been an 
option at the time gurdies first were fitted with trompettes, then a great 
builder, recognizing that this was a way to improve the sound, would have 
fitted the instrument with a curved soundboard.  But if the knowledge stopped 
at flat tops, then the builder would have built the best flat topped instrument 
he could, and the instrument would be limited by that design characteristic, 
but could still have had a nice, pleasant, workable and usable tone.  It just 
wouldn't have sounded like a curved top instrument.

      A person performing at a high state function for a Crown would have spent 
time preparing his instrument, greasing and truing and doing what needed to be 
done to make it sound right.  It might not have stayed that way, but it would 
have been able to sound good for at least a while.  The 'best that the 
instrument could sound' is the sound I am wanting to recreate, and if using 
modern materials and techniques can allow me to kind of 'lock in' that sound, 
then I am not against doing so.  But an instrument that has the visual and 
accoustic properties of the very best instrument of the period at it's very 
best sound, that is what I am after. (Oh, and it simply cannot be a Henry or a 
Bosch.  It just can't.  Non-negotiable.)

      It is a rather stuck-up and elite pursuit, but I want to have the very, 
very best medieval gurdy around, and to be able to truly and accurately 
demonstrate how good that instrument could sound in a period atmosphere playing 
period music in a period way.

      Chris

      *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

      On 2/6/2008 at 1:31 PM Roy Trotter wrote:
        Confidential to Chris, this is not the worst (not the Best either) of 
the old recordings. I don't own any of the field recordings under discussion. I 
have heard enough to lose interest.... The biggest problem in the early 
recordings is lumpy wheels and squeal. There was something on Youtube of a very 
pretty girl playing fairly well, but the poor machine was squealing like a pig 
in a fence. I didn't run that one much, and can't find it now.
        It sounds to me that Mr. Hogwood is not a HG player, just somebody that 
was playing at the moment. (Is this this was the same Sir Christopher Hogwood 
that went on to fame as fortune as a conductor? ) The notes are too passive. I 
may be spoilt to that zesty, emphatic, precise playing of MM Imbert, Bouffard, 
Chabenant, et al.

        I understand and appreciate your project, but unless you really like 
scraping the wheel everytime the humidity changes, you really want a twencen 
laminated wheel. In some of the old instruments, there is some evidence that 
the shaft was pounded into the wheel... I hope into a pre-drilled hole.... 
Players that have seen me build, comment on the violence involved, but driving 
a shaft (pig-iron or wood) into wheel like a nail is too much even for me. I'm 
not trying to discourage you from something you really want to do, but 
personally, I wouldn't want an instrument that took all my playing time up in 
maint. Carved body sounds interesting though.

        Doing a re-rosin during a performance is par for the course. I never 
liked performing solo, My first choice for a partner is a good storyteller that 
can keep an audience enthralled during an emergency re-cotton. I refuse to true 
an oval wheel on stage. OK call me a snob...

        Roy


        On Feb 5, 2008 11:46 PM, Kathy Hutchins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

          From: "Thomas A. Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


          >> and dogs and cats will run from it
          >
          > Is this a common occurrence when playing the HG?
          >
          > I ask in all seriousness, because I am quite interested in getting 
an  HG,
          > but if it scares the cats, it won't be welcome in the house.


          We have a number of odd instruments in the house. Besides my harp and
          embryonic HG, I also have a circa 1870 Erard grand piano. My husband 
plays
          viola, accordion, tenor saxophone, Irish flute, and smallpipes. My 
older
          daughter is a cellist. My younger daughter is a percussionist, and 
has in
          addition to the standard school-issue snare drum, a bodhran and a 
medieval
          rope tension drum. We have a wooden bucket full of pennywhistles, 
recorders,
          and bamboo flutes. Out of all these instruments, the only one that 
affects
          the animals (two dogs, eight cats) is a Generation D tinwhistle. I 
don't
          know what it is about this particular whistle, but the minute I start
          playing it both dogs put their noses in the air and start howling like
          wolves, and the cats all either rush to the door to be let out, or go 
hide
          upstairs.

          I mean, it has to be the instrument, right? It couldn't possibly be my
          playing.

          And to the fellow who was going to use that mp3 to scare raccoons out 
of the
          attic: to me, it kind of sounded like raccoons mating, so I'm not 
sure it
          will have the effect you intended. My attic is actually full of 
squirrels
          right now. and nothing seems to frighten them.

          Kathy Hutchins
          [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
      Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1250 - Release Date: 
29-1-2008 22:20

Reply via email to