2010/7/22 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: > Cool. Yes go ahead on 530.
done, I also included HSEARCH-565, hopefully Hudson will agree on that. Looking forward for the release announcement :) > > Thanks Sanne > > On 22 juil. 2010, at 16:50, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> 2010/7/22 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: >>> Looks like a good candidate for back port indeed. >>> Add the 3.2.1 version to the existing bug, that's the easiest solution. >> >> Hi, I merged HSEARCH-534 in the the 3.2 branch. >> If you agree with it I could spend some minutes to merge HSEARCH-530 >> too, I don't see more interesting issues. >> >> Sanne >> >>> >>> On 22 juil. 2010, at 00:47, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinov...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> maybe HSEARCH-534 could be considered: non-intrusive change, nasty bug too. >>>> What's the procedure? I suppose 1) edit "fix versions" to add the >>>> 3.2.1 2) merge the changeset in the branch >>>> or should we also open a new issue, or reopen the same one? >>>> >>>> 2010/7/19 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: >>>>> Since 3.3 is not out yet (likely an end of summer target), I'm thinking >>>>> on releasing a maintenance version of the 3.2 series. >>>>> HSEARCH-540 is a pretty nasty bug (due to lack of Synchronization >>>>> execution ordering - see Re: [hibernate-dev] Exceptions thrown in a tx >>>>> synchronization are eaten by Steve on July 14th). >>>>> >>>>> Any other bug you think cannot wait and should be back-ported? >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
