Correct, provided that entity had only one mode on the SessionFactory On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 17:46 +0200, Adam Warski wrote: > On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > I'd have to look closer at the envers code to know for sure, but the > > option I can see here is to say that the entity mode specified for a > > session factory is the entity mode we use when building the metamodel > > from hbm.xml or annotations. Envers would then build its metamodel > > structures as it needs using the map entity mode. So it would be "per > > entity" in a way, but in more broad strokes, the net effect being that a > > given entity could only have one mode representation in a given session > > factory. > > Sounds good. So it wouldn't be illegal to use a different entity mode than > the one specified for a SessionFactory, as long as one entity type is used > consistently with one entity mode? (Currently Envers specifies the entity > mode as map in the hibernate entity mapping it generates) >
-- Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
