Ah good point, I haven't thought of that problem with query splitting

On 30 nov. 2011, at 22:20, Steve Ebersole wrote:

> Splitting is not always an option.  Consider a predicate like:
> 
> ... where a in (x1, ... x2000) and b in (y1, ... y2000) ...
> 
> If you split this up, you will have misses.  Yes, it works if you can keep it 
> all in one query because you can structure it to maintain the original 
> semantics.  However, please read the comments on that JIRA issue.  For some 
> databases, this restriction is not just on the number of elements in a 
> in-list, but on the number of parameters overall.  Splitting these 2 in-lists 
> about into 4 does not address that.
> 
> I commented on the issue that I am actually inclined to simply reject this 
> one.  In fact, I thought we already did.  Maybe that was another earlier one?
> 
> 
> On Wed 30 Nov 2011 04:45:55 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> Also note that there is a limit for the query size globally in some vendors 
>> and that people relieved from HHH-1123 cal fall into the second limit.
>> A solution would be for Hibernate to split one query into several but I'm 
>> not sure I like the idea.
>> 
>> Emmanuel
>> 
>> On 29 nov. 2011, at 21:29, Łukasz Antoniak wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all!
>>> 
>>> Recently I had a closer look at HHH-1123 issue. This bug affects both -
>>> Criteria API and HQL. I have introduced
>>> Dialect#maximumInExpressionElements() method which returns maximum
>>> number of allowed elements in a single SQL IN clause, or null treated as
>>> infinite. The change of InExpression was very easy. However, fixing this
>>> bug for HQL queries requires modification of ParameterMetadata
>>> (namedDescriptorMap cannot remain unmodifiable), as well as
>>> AbstractQueryImpl (queryString). As I don't see any other solution, I
>>> wanted to ask you guys for suggestions. Is it the only possible way of
>>> fixing this issue? Finally, shall we really fix this? This is a DB
>>> vendor limitation, but 40 user gave their vote for it.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Lukasz Antoniak
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> 
> -- 
> st...@hibernate.org
> http://hibernate.org


_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Reply via email to