On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Anderson vasconcelos wrote:
> Hi Hardy, Thanks for the reply. > I Wanna use HIbernate Search, because it has a lot of features that SOLRJ > doesn't have, like embebed objects mapping, easy way to call search (because > is similar to create HQL query) and easy way to integrate database data with > index data. > For developers, Hibernate Search is more easy to use. That's good to hear :-) > Also, i wanna use solr like a search server ( with master, slaves and shards). Hibernate Search also offers master/slave setups using JMS or JGroups for communication between master and slaves. Have a look at http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/search/reference/en-US/html_single/#jms-backend Also it is possible to split large indexes into multiple shards (if this is what you mean with sharding). Do you have a concrete use case or requirement you think Search cannot meet? --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
