On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote: > I'm not really sure which is the better option here. Given that method > validation is the biggest new feature of BV 1.1 and HV 5 will be the > first release to implement that new version of the spec, I think it > would be ok if that release breaks clients without a previous > deprecation period. On the other hand it might actually be not that > complex to keep the old and the new API in HV 5 and remove the old one > in 5.1.
For me the main reason for HV-561 and adding deprecation messages was to give the users a heads up on what's to come in HV 5. It is of course not strictly in the sense of @deprecated to not provide an alternative at the same time. Maybe Emmanuel is right and we should just use the blog and wiki to take care of this. Regarding keeping old and new in HV 5 and removing the old version in 5.1 I vote -1. I really would like to see a clear cut in HV 5. Also most of the changes are really trivial package renames. Personally I think it is ok to add the deprecation warnings even w/o an immediate replacement. In a certain sense HV 4.3 is anyways a transition release for people between HV 4.2 (which is the reference implementation of Bean Validation 1.0) and HV 5 (which will be the reference implementation for BV 1.1). If we decide against the warnings I think we should just rely on blog and wiki to make sure everything is documented and people have a clear way of migration. --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
