On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > Gunnar, it is largely irrelevant based on the legal expertise we have > been given by Red Hat. > > But if you are going to keep up with it (and I think there is value to > that, and do it myself still) generally the year should just be touched > for non-trivial updates. A range is good. Simply updating the year to > the current year is fine. Listing years of all such non-trivial > updates is yet another good approach. Personally I tend to just update > the year.
+1 My preference is also to just update the year. --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
