We've never said we were not accepting new dialects. What was said is that there needs to be some accountability for new dialects. Sounds like we have that here...
On 05/03/2013 05:37 AM, Andrew Clemons wrote: > Hi, > > On 2013-05-03 17:17:28 +0800, Strong Liu wrote: >> I think the main reason is the lack of dev resource, if someone is >> willing to promise that long time contribution / maintains, I'm fine >> with that, or it will just become some dead code that we don't have >> knowledge nor time to maintains. > I probably should have mentioned this in my first email, but I work for > SAP (through an acquisition). I am not involved in HANA development, but > was told it might be interesting to port the app I work on to HANA, so > that's how I got started working on the dialect on my own time. I asked > around internally at SAP and was told there was a lot of interest in > having Hibernate support for HANA and that quite a few external > inquiries had been made about it. I was encouraged to submit this (which > I was planning anyway) and that SAP are also willing to maintain it. SAP > have also already submitted code for HANA to EclipseLink. > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
