Yes that looks fishy. The only explanation I can see is if that approach is supposed to use the byte code enhancement lazy as opposed to proxy but AFAIR we have different annotations to express that.
On 15 Mar 2014, at 18:48, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > There is a test currently failing with the new metamodel code. The mapping > that causes the problem has the following annotations: > > @Id > @ManyToOne(...) > @JoinColumns(...) > @Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY) > > Is it really legal to combine @ManyToOne and @Basic? Those seem "at odds". > My guess is that the legacy binding code simply did not validate for this. > > Wdyt? > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
