Nice. I think the approach makes sense in our current situation, and I also like that we clearly explain what we are trying to do and why.
Good stuff. —Hardy On 1 Jan 2014, at 20:04, Brett Meyer <brme...@redhat.com> wrote: > All, here's the write up. Comments appreciated! > > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/HibernateORMJIRAPoliciesAndCleanUpTactics > > Brett Meyer > Red Hat, Hibernate ORM > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Ebersole" <st...@hibernate.org> > To: "Brett Meyer" <brme...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Hardy Ferentschik" <ha...@hibernate.org>, "Hibernate" > <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:01:38 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets > > Probably not a bad idea to write up a blog describing what we are doing and > why. We could link to that in the Jira comment > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Brett Meyer <brme...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues >> >> I'm sure some legitimate things may get caught up in this, but I'd rather >> try to clean things up aggressively, then re-open on a case-by-case basis. >> If there's something we close that the community feels strongly about, the >> hope is that they'll comment on it and bring it to our attention. >> >> Brett Meyer >> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <ha...@hibernate.org> >> To: "Brett Meyer" <brme...@redhat.com> >> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:40:55 PM >> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets >> >> >> On 31 Jan 2014, at 21:09, Brett Meyer <brme...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Recently, we've been trying to clean up ORM's JIRA tickets. There are a >> lot of duplication, stale issues, etc. One thought was pushing all ORM 3 >> tickets to the "Awaiting Test Case" state and requesting a reproducer on >> ORM 4 or 5. They would then fall under our policy of automatically >> rejecting those tickets that did not receive a test case within 3 months or >> so. >> >> Sounds like a fair attempt to try to get a grip on all these open issues. >> >>> This obviously would not include new features/improvements, anything >> assigned to someone, etc. >> >> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues, since >> Bug is the default issue type and some people don't change the type >> even so they describe a feature/improvement. But that might not be >> important. >> >> --Hardy >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
