On 25 Jan 2014, at 18:37, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> This is all certainly true. I think specifically of things like > persisters, which by "package break down" are currently considered API. > > Also, as far as OSGi, I would suggest not worrying about that so much > (Gunnar). Keep in mind that even today this OSGi manifest info is > generated by build logic. Changing that build logic to look at annotations > rather that parsing .class file path is not that big of a deal imo. > Devil's-in-the-details of course, but in theory it should not be a big > deal. I agree that the generation of the OSGi metadata via annotation would not be such a big problem, however, OSGi does afaik not allow to configure modules on a class level. The fines granularity on what is exported is on package level. Just saying. —Hardy
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
