On 1 April 2015 at 11:39, Ales Justin <ales.jus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I expect our Update routines to still work. I don't know what the code >> you're showing does though, as those are not our APIs. >> >> If you could share a test using our APIs I'll look at it. > > What about if you run our test? :-) > (it should be easy -- once you have all CD projects checked-out and built)
Sorry I won't have time this week, I'll be on holidays next week, and then probably have to catch up the week after. If you're happy to wait a month, ok. >> The only thing I can think of is that now there's an explicit FLUSH >> type of Work, if you miss that you might hit stale (deleted) values >> with a Query.. but this mistake should only be possible if you're >> driving the backend directly as our public APIs generate them as >> needed. > > Do we need to call this flush explicitly? Yes > As I added Thread::sleep(3000) between update and lookup, and it didn't help. It's event based, not time sensitive. > > -Ales > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
