Hi Max, could you make an example please? Looks like you are interpreting Steve's email in a different way than me. On 24 Jul 2015 21:43, "Max Rydahl Andersen" <mande...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:48, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > Do we want to consider automatically applying known database limits on > > various identifier lengths? This is trickier to implement than it > > might > > sound. And it would definitely need to wait for the reworking of > > annotation binding. But in general I wonder if y'all see this as a > > desirable feature. And if so, should that be just for implicit names? > > Or > > explicit names as well? > > I could see it be valuable for easier cross db testing, but all users > custom queries > would be easily broken unless you have something very deterministic. > > If we do it think I as a user would prefer at least get a warning or be > able to turn on "strict" mode > to catch issues where I did not realise > "MY_SUPER_AWESOME_COLUMN_NAME_CANT_ALWAYS_BE_USED". > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
