On Fri, May 27, 2016, 3:01 AM Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> > This looks awesome and we look forward to make use of it in Hibernate OGM. > One thing I'm wondering is how closely tied to Hibernate ORM 6 this will > be. Is the plan to move all the SQM bits into the hibernate-orm repo > eventually? Or will SQM remain a separate component, and only the > implementation of the type system will live in ORM? > The plan is to have it remain a separate artifact. That was done to allow OGM (send others) to more easily consume SQM, mainly because of the type system abstraction. > The reason for asking is that I'm trying to gauge how feasible it'd be to > use SQM in a Hibernate OGM based on ORM 5.x. That'd be much simpler (or > even only actually doable without essentially copying code), if SQM would > remain separate, and we'd "only" have to copy/backport the type system > implementation. > This would be *possible*. Not sure how good of an idea it is, but that's a different discussion :) _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
