I'm also for changing the signature, therefore simplifying the implementation. We've had some issues due to the fact that it expects Object[] and Chris and I had to do some hacks to fix them.
Vlad On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Chris Cranford <cranc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Steve - > > I'm inclined to agree that changing signatures makes the most sense at > this point. > > Chris > > > On 12/27/2016 04:02 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > FWIW my inclination is to just change the existing signatures. 6.0 is a > > major release with major changes already wrt querying. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:01 PM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > > > >> For 6.0 I'd like to also make ScrollableResults parameterized wrt the > "row > >> type". E.g. > >> > >> ScrollableResults<Person> sr = session.createQuery( ..., Person.class > >> ).scroll(); > >> > >> However that changes the signature of its methods returning a "row" > >> (currently always defined as Object[]). > >> > >> How would everyone prefer we handle this? Do I just change the > signatures > >> of the existing methods? Or add new methods? > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
