My thoughts....
On 01/28/2017 06:00 AM, Christian Beikov wrote: > I created an issue for this feature: > https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11433 > > > Am 27.01.2017 um 23:58 schrieb Steve Ebersole >> I personally would vote to *not* make this change in 5.x even in terms >> of making it configurable. The grammar there is fugly enough already >> and this is the kind of thing (especially making branches of it >> configurable) that takes that fugliness to a new level. > I gave that another thought and don't think that requiring the user to > do a separate join is a good idea anymore. We can actually infer if a > join is required and when using the ANSI parenthesis join syntax the > join type does not really matter. If we stick to the join rendering > style we have, we should just use the collection tables join type. > > Do you think it makes sense to implement support for "JOIN > KEY(m).association" in 5.2 or just leave it as it is? I would implement > that if you give your ok. > > What do you think about all that so far? > I'd say we likely shouldn't be putting significant effort into adding **new features*** *into 5.2. I'd recommend adding it into the 6.0 branch and if/when we decide to consider a 5.3 branch release as a further stepping stone to 6.0, perhaps we back-port this feature to that branch if the team feels its relevant to do so. But that's just my perspective :). Chris _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev