> Should I make those changes on top of yours? I will do it and merge.
Thanks all for the feedback. On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 at 16:23 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> See you cheated though. You "just happened" to use a project that has a >> dedicated groupId. If we used a dedicated groupId for ORM >> (`org.hibernate.orm` e.g.) then its not a big deal either way. >> > > I didn't cheat. I gave a random link. Yoann made it work for the old > Validator releases which use the shared org.hibernate groupId: > http://staging.hibernate.org/validator/releases/5.4/ > > >> Craft the same search for ORM and compare (1) the display and (2) the >> complexity needed to build the search. >> >> If you don't like the release/version-specific view Bintray offers then >> fine - that's your point of view. I just happen to completely disagree. >> > > Yeah, well, all the not so interesting/general information are taking all > the screen and you have to scroll to see the artifact you were looking for > at the bottom of the page. > > Add to that a bug with Firefox that makes you go to the top of the page > everytime you click on the artifact dropdown. (Maybe you can ping them > about it if you have contacts there) > > Yeah, sorry, I'm not impressed. > > Bintray is in fact in the middle of a UI/UX rewrite, so... >> >> And selecting the "main" artifact used in the drop down is one of those >> items >> > > OK, let's hope it's going to be better then. > > @Yoann so +1 from me for the new behavior of the NoORM projects, it works > great. > > -- > Guillaume > -- Yoann Rodiere yo...@hibernate.org / yrodi...@redhat.com Software Engineer Hibernate NoORM team _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
