> Should I make those changes on top of yours?
I will do it and merge.
Thanks all for the feedback.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 at 16:23 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>
>> See you cheated though. You "just happened" to use a project that has a
>> dedicated groupId. If we used a dedicated groupId for ORM
>> (`org.hibernate.orm` e.g.) then its not a big deal either way.
> I didn't cheat. I gave a random link. Yoann made it work for the old
> Validator releases which use the shared org.hibernate groupId:
>> Craft the same search for ORM and compare (1) the display and (2) the
>> complexity needed to build the search.
>> If you don't like the release/version-specific view Bintray offers then
>> fine - that's your point of view. I just happen to completely disagree.
> Yeah, well, all the not so interesting/general information are taking all
> the screen and you have to scroll to see the artifact you were looking for
> at the bottom of the page.
> Add to that a bug with Firefox that makes you go to the top of the page
> everytime you click on the artifact dropdown. (Maybe you can ping them
> about it if you have contacts there)
> Yeah, sorry, I'm not impressed.
> Bintray is in fact in the middle of a UI/UX rewrite, so...
>> And selecting the "main" artifact used in the drop down is one of those
> OK, let's hope it's going to be better then.
> @Yoann so +1 from me for the new behavior of the NoORM projects, it works
yo...@hibernate.org / yrodi...@redhat.com
Hibernate NoORM team
hibernate-dev mailing list