Emmanuel, is this a correct link? That one is ORM 5.1 vs. 5.3 binary compatibility analysis...
I have seen [1] posted earlier today on; is this what you have in mind? I am very happy that JDBC will have an async variant; we have some plans for asynchronous persistence in Infinispan so this might would be definitely useful to our JDBC stores. I only wish there'd be an async thread-independent JTA next, too. Radim [1] https://blogs.oracle.com/java/jdbc-next%3a-a-new-asynchronous-api-for-connecting-to-a-database On 03/20/2018 12:01 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Nothing really new for people at the edge of news but a nice > presentation showing how async JDBC will likely work > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jH0znbYwgvGKHC-110zcjRaXLllBsvRKw-pdHrMzRzw > > Emmanuel > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev -- Radim Vansa <rva...@redhat.com> JBoss Performance Team _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
