I finished going through this second iteration. I started color each finding to better indicate its "status":
- Blue = converted to a Jira - Red = things I do not think we want to change (migration guide) - Green = things that I considered "open items" - we should discuss further All have comments to a Jira, etc Let me know if anyone has further comments. P.S. Rather than keep an ever-expanding list of changes in the description of HHH-12424 I started making sub-tasks to track each piece. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:45 AM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote: > On 6 April 2018 at 14:56, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > That's called a migration guide :) > > Good point :) > > > > > And I agree, we should capture behavioral differences there too. > > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:51 AM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> > >> On 5 April 2018 at 22:03, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > >> > I am assuming that mean you behavioral compatibility (they act the > >> > same)... > >> > > >> > Well that's the point of tests. The real problem is that often there > >> > are > >> > not tests for a specific thing or someone changed the test > expectations > >> > during development > >> > >> Agreed on the point of tests. But I'm wondering if we want to track > >> existing behavioural incompatibilities we know of in a similar > >> document / as an appendix of it / labels on JIRA. > >> > >> Granted the binary compatibility is the first and most important > >> milestone, but I'd hope we could work also on some of the other ones > >> such as HHH-12454. > >> > >> I'm not suggesting that we solve them all - but it would be good to > >> collect a list of known compatibility issues to review once more as > >> when we decided on breaking some thing we weren't evaluating problems > >> in the light of continuous delivery requirements. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sanne > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:56 PM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> This report is focusing on binary compatibility. Which is great, but > >> >> we should also pay attention to some other significant > >> >> incompatibilities such as HHH-12454. > >> >> > >> >> How do you prefer to track those, if at all? > >> >> > >> >> David mentioned that we're only *required* to provide binary > >> >> compatibility, but we could of course be a bit better than the > minimum > >> >> required - when doable. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 5 April 2018 at 21:48, Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> > I basically re-ran the same report on the newer snapshots. > >> >> > Incompatibilities listed in the old report that were resolved do > not > >> >> > appear > >> >> > in the new report. > >> >> > > >> >> > I also categorized the incompatibilities as discussed in comments > in > >> >> > the > >> >> > second report (e.g., Failures Mitigated using Compatibility > >> >> > Transformer). > >> >> > > >> >> > I un-crossed-out the issues that were not resolved yet (e.g., by > >> >> > HHH-12424 > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > < > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-12424&sa=D&ust=1522883266264000&usg=AFQjCNHpVLWh2bMWaaGQNl1ywkmjjQggSg > > > >> >> > ). > >> >> > > >> >> > I think the only unresolved comment was the one about > >> >> > JPA_METAMODEL_POPULATION, so I responded to it in the new report. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Steve Ebersole < > st...@hibernate.org> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Are these in addition to the original documentation? How do we > >> >> >> correlate > >> >> >> things from this new doc that have already been addressed via the > >> >> >> previous? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:00 PM Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> I've re-run the report to see what is still outstanding. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Here's the link: > >> >> >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZjdVuNzYPjjmvVd7mDLw9zwy9c0By > >> >> >>> _FP0oj8DkHgiBE/edit?usp=sharing > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I'll share to the same people as the last report. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Regards, > >> >> >>> Gail > >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >>> hibernate-dev mailing list > >> >> >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> >> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list > >> >> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev