Okay.. I guess that kind of thing is that someone looking at code will sometimes say "String concatenation Bad!", which I think is really a bit of a myth in modern JVM's..
I have to say, the ability to write a HQL query that works with subclasses is yet again one of the amazing things about Hibernate. In Fulcrum security, all the HQL is included in the java code. But, subclass the object, provide your own hbm mapping, and all of a sudden your custom subclassed user object works perfectly! Christian, I noticed you are on the speaking list for JavaPolis, I'm hoping to attend. Sorry about winmail.dat, i need to get something better then outlook! Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Eric Pugh > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Performance Difference in HQL? > > > On 30 Oct (21:40), Eric Pugh wrote: > > > If I use the second method, then I don't have to worry when > I move my class > > around, versus the first method I have to keep the > classpath up to date in > > the queries..? > > It shouldn't make any difference. > > [-- Attachment #2: winmail.dat --] > > Please stop that. > > -- > Christian Bauer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
