Finally, why is the "having" node a submode of the "group" node?
Because it is a dependent sub-clause of 'group by' at the moment. Is that not the case?
Hmmmm. I suppose it is. well, as long as we can support
from ..... where .... group having .....
as well as the traditional
from ..... where .... group by .... having .....
then I'm happy
-- Gavin King JBoss Group +61 410534454 http://hibernate.org
------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
