Yes, but xdoclet 1.2b3 has xdoclet 1.2b4 in its jar filenames!
However, I'm all for filename versioning since there's nothing worse than trying to figure out which versions your tools are in big projects with hundreds of jars.
It doesn't have to mean CVS problems, however. You can't have a good release strategy without proper tagging of your repository.
c
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
That's good, because they're wrong sometimes ;-) (dom4j-1.4 has 1.3 on it's manifest)
what's wrong with using the manifest?
No one reads it :)
I'm a +1 on version in filenames. It would have reduce some cglib mistakes of the rc1.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
