On Jul 22, 2004, at 2:07 AM, Henri Tremblay wrote:
I don't know if I made myself clear. I can provide a test case if needed (and continue the discussion in the forum which is probably a more appropriate place I think).
You didn't. I guess you have to rethink what "not null" means again. It means an entity must have a relationship to another entity. So, if A and B have a relationship and B has a "not null" foreign key, then B needs a reference to A. Even if you remove the B from the collection of B's in the A.
This is an FAQ. You need a bidirectional relationship in this case. It's not a "Hibernate requirement", but just natural for your data model.
-- Christian Bauer +49 171 455 66 53
Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
