On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:35:50 -0600, Gavin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sure, create() was only there during the HB3 beta cycle. It was never in
a final release.

stupid shortterm memory! ;)

btw. I reckon there is a good reason for having both persist() and save() available.
Could we get that reason and the difference between them pinned down in a faq or something ?
would be nice to point to when users start noting these small differences I assume there is.
(same for merge/saveUpdate etc. i guss)


-max


-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Friday, 25 February 2005 11:24 PM To: Hibernate development Subject: [Hibernate] create renamed to persist...

Hi,

Is it intentional that create() have been replaced with persist()
without
putting create() on the classic session ?

(p.s. *PLEASE* include metadata/tools/etc. AND their testcases when
doing
such broad
refactorings ...tia)




-- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org

JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jboss.com


------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel

Reply via email to